AAP © Enlarge photoWHY AUSTRALIA & NOT CHINA, INDIA OR THE MIDDLE EAST??? PLENTY OF ROOM IN THOSE PLACES AS WELL!!!
A new poll shows more than half the population wants refugees arriving by boat to have their asylum claims processed in Australia.
The public's position is in contrast with that of the Labor Party and coalition, who both advocate processing in a third country.
The Herald/Nielsen poll of 1400 people showed 53 per cent of people prefer onshore processing, with 28 per cent saying they felt refugees should be sent to another country.
Of the 53 per cent, 55 per cent said those processed in Australia should be held in detention and 41 per cent said refugees should be able to live in the community while their claims are assessed.
The federal government has already signed a deal to send 800 asylum seekers to Malaysia, though the first group of refugees to be transferred under the arrangement have not yet made the journey.
The deal is being challenged in the High Court by refugee advocate lawyer David Manne.
Papua New Guinea has also recently agreed to reopen the Manus Island processing centre.
The coalition advocates reopening a processing centre on the island of Nauru.
The public's position is in contrast with that of the Labor Party and coalition, who both advocate processing in a third country.
The Herald/Nielsen poll of 1400 people showed 53 per cent of people prefer onshore processing, with 28 per cent saying they felt refugees should be sent to another country.
Of the 53 per cent, 55 per cent said those processed in Australia should be held in detention and 41 per cent said refugees should be able to live in the community while their claims are assessed.
The federal government has already signed a deal to send 800 asylum seekers to Malaysia, though the first group of refugees to be transferred under the arrangement have not yet made the journey.
The deal is being challenged in the High Court by refugee advocate lawyer David Manne.
Papua New Guinea has also recently agreed to reopen the Manus Island processing centre.
The coalition advocates reopening a processing centre on the island of Nauru.
This is how white countries are lost; to 3rd world immigration via refugee status. Ask any of these refugees how they feel about white australians a year from now and they'll say they are all racist. Meanwhile, they'll be given a place to live, food to eat and expenses for the several children they have (and continue to have). When I traveled to australia and stayed there for some time I needed to make sure I had international health insurance (because they didn't want me to use the free health care), needed all kinds of references when renting a place on a lease and was put through the ringer going through the airport checkpoints. Anyway, while in australia I spoke with several aboriginal people there and several of them said the blacks coming into australia as refugees were racist towards them. In fact, they even went so far as to say the blacks were trying to replace the aboriginal peoples in several australian locations.
I'd also like to add that the "polls" of which they are no specific details is more conducive to an ulterior motive which seeks to get these refugees into the country and NOT with altruistic intentions. This story was written by someone specifically with specific agendas in mind (just read it, sounds more like commentary than news). There is an agenda to flood australia with non-whites, similar to the agenda in all white countries by the powers that be. The media is RIFE with these people and their agenda. It is not "Green" types because to be "Green" is to want LESS people thus preserving the environment. It is a particular tribe of individuals who view their race as superior and white countries as their enemy. It is a particular race of people who masquerade as Whites but in reality despises them. It is a racial/religious group who dominate the media and impose things such as immigration in order to destabilize the white civilizations which welcomed them in the first place. They use well-meaning people as their shield and make a dozen seem like it's the majority. They make it "immoral" to resist them, even if it means Australia is turned into a 3rd world gangland in the process...
I'd also like to add that the "polls" of which they are no specific details is more conducive to an ulterior motive which seeks to get these refugees into the country and NOT with altruistic intentions. This story was written by someone specifically with specific agendas in mind (just read it, sounds more like commentary than news). There is an agenda to flood australia with non-whites, similar to the agenda in all white countries by the powers that be. The media is RIFE with these people and their agenda. It is not "Green" types because to be "Green" is to want LESS people thus preserving the environment. It is a particular tribe of individuals who view their race as superior and white countries as their enemy. It is a particular race of people who masquerade as Whites but in reality despises them. It is a racial/religious group who dominate the media and impose things such as immigration in order to destabilize the white civilizations which welcomed them in the first place. They use well-meaning people as their shield and make a dozen seem like it's the majority. They make it "immoral" to resist them, even if it means Australia is turned into a 3rd world gangland in the process...
One last thing I'd like to comment on regarding this story is that there are more places on the planet which meet the australian criteria for refugee status than not. When one looks at the countries these refugees are coming in from you will find similar circumstances within dozens of 3rd world non-white countries. Should australia just allow ALL of the refugees worldwide to flood into their country? Should they break the backs of the middle class (for they are the ones who foot the bill) in favor of an unskilled underclass which doesn't even know the language? And why is it that 99% of non-white people worldwide consider white people and their countries racist yet it is only those places they wish to immigrate to? Why not go to China, India, Israel or the Middle East? Why do they flood ONLY to Australia and the like? TOD
No comments:
Post a Comment